Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to apply for extension of time. Benches explicitly declined to record opinion on merits due to procedural withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL.2204/2016(913)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2204 OF 2016
Mohammed Umer Abdullah Shaikh
...Petitioner
Vs.
Municipal Corporation for Gr. Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Amrut Joshi i/b. Nikhil Mishra, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate for the BMC
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 12TH AUGUST, 2016
P.C. :
Matter is not on board. In view of the urgency taken on
board and heard forthwith.
appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to move application seeking extension of time as fixed in the order dated 4th
August, 2016 passed in Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016. With the aforesaid liberty the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
WPL.2204/2016(913)
2
Needless to state that we have not commented on the merits
of the matter.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Mohammed Umer Abdullah Shaikh
Municipal Corporation for Gr. Bombay
Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
