The High Court at Bombay allowed a writ filed by the State Bank of India to be withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
908-WPL-2134-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2134 OF 2016
State Bank of India .. Petitioner versus Subhash Agarwal & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Umesh Shetty with Mr. J. B. Mavlani i/b. Kusumakar Kaushik for Petitioner.
Dr. Birendra Saraf i/b. Jay Choksi with Yogi Joshi for Respondents.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 05 AUGUST 2016
P.C.:
1] Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2] Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
State Bank of India
Subhash Agarwal & Ors.
V. M. KANADE
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
