Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition on grounds of infructuousness. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 6721-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 6721 OF 2014
Sunstream City Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioners Vs.
Paryavaran Dakshata Manch & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. D. V. Deokar a/w Subodh Joshi i/b Parimal K. Shroff & Co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pravartak Pathak, for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. C. M. Lokesh, for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. S. S. Pakale a/w Parag Vyas, for Respondent No. 5 – UOI.
Ms. Rupali Dixit i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent Nos.7 & 8. Mr. V. B. Thadani, AGP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 4, 2016
PC.
. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that on account of subsequent events, the petition has infructuous. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is accordingly disposed of.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Sunstream City Pvt. Ltd.
Respondents
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
