Disposed

Hemant B.Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Aug 2016CRPIL/29/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed under Article 226 seeking writ of certiorari and investigation directions against MLAs/MLCs for protests in Vidhan Bhavan prem... High Court refused to exercise writ jurisdiction, reserving petitioner's rights to seek reliefs before alternate efficacious forum, and disposed of petition without granting any relief.

What did the court decide?

None granted. Petitioner to seek reliefs before alternate efficacious forum.

Hemant B.Patil Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2016)

skc

33-CRPILL-29-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (STAMP) NO. 29 OF 2016

¶7

Mr. Hemant B. Patil	..	Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.	..	Respondents

¶8

Mr. R. N. Kachave for Petitioner. Mr. S. K. Shinde with Mr. K. V. Saste for Respondents.

¶9

CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 05 AUGUST 2016

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1] This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:

¶12

“(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent No. 1 to 3 under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the entire records on the representation made by the petitioner as an Exhibit – A, in respect of various protest, breach of peace, violation of law and order made by various MLAs and MLCs in the premises of Vidhan Bhavan and prohibited areas like Court, Mantralaya, etc. and to file a detailed Report within a specified period.

¶13

(b) This Hon'ble Court may kindly pass and order of direction to respondent No. 1 to 3 for inquiry and investigation and legal action against culprits MLAs and MLCs in the premises of Vidhan Bhavan and prohibited areas like Courts in

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

2 33-CRPILL-29-16.doc

¶16

skc

¶17

various incidences.

¶18

(c) Interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer (b) above;

¶19

(d) For cost of the petition;

¶20

(e) For such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require, be passed.:

¶21

2] We are afraid that we will not be in a position to consider or grant reliefs claimed by the petitioner in the petition while exercising our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Reserving the right of the petitioner to seek the reliefs claimed by him before the alternate efficacious forum, petition is disposed of.

¶22

(M. S. SONAK, J.)

¶23

(V. M. KANADE, J.)

¶24

chandka

¶25

2 of 2

Hemant B.Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant B.Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aapli Mansa Vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Mr. Sayyed Yusuf Afroz Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Sunstream City Pvt. Ltd. Vs Paryavaran Dakshata Manch, through Secretary, Prof. Vidhyadhar Atmaram Walawalkar and Ors.

State Bank of India Vs Subhash Agarwal and 4 Ors.

Shri Sandeep Sambhaji Pharate Vs the State of Maharashtra through Honble Revenue Minister and Ors.

Union of India and 2 Ors. Vs Kirti Bhavesh Oza