This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
WP 1019 of 2015
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1019 OF 2015
Union of India and ors. ….Petitioners Vs. Smt. Kirti B. Oza ….Respondent ******
None for the Petitioners
Mr. Ravindranath D. Shetty for Respondent
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 8, 2016
P.C. :
Shetty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.
2/2
WP 1019 of 2015
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench,
Mumbai in favour of the Respondent.
petition. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
M.S. SONAK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Union of India and ors.
Smt. Kirti B. Oza
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
