Disposed
Vishwambar Bandu Renewad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/12725/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp1272516.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12725 OF 2016
Vishwambar s/o Bandu Renewad
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.U.Jadhav, advocate for the petitioner Mr.Y.G.Gujrathi, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2016
PER COURT:
Petitioner claims to belong to “Koli Malhar”, Scheduled Tribe and is in receipt of the caste certificate issued by the competent authority. The petitioner has been appointed as forest guard in the office of Respondent No.3 as against a vacancy reserved for Scheduled Tribe category. The caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner was referred for verification to the Scrutiny Committee and the proposal is stated to be still pending. As a result of failure of the petitioner to submit validity certificate within stipulated time under the appointment order. The appointing authority has issued a notice to the petitioner to submit validity certificate and he has been further warned of adverse action in the event of his failure to submit validity certificate.
2 Considering facts and circumstances of this petition, this petition can be disposed of by directing Respondent No.2Committee to take decision on the proposal of the petitioner, as
{2}
wp1272516.odt
expeditiously as possible, preferably within one year; and it is accordingly directed. Respondent No.3 is directed not to take coercive action against the petitioner during pendency of the proposal before the Scrutiny Committee.
3 It would be open for the employer to take appropriate action depending upon outcome of the proposal for verification of caste certificate of the petitioner by Respondent No.4-Committee.
4 Writ Petition stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE
adb/wp1272516
Vishwambar s/o Bandu Renewad
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court