Petitioner invoking Article 226 challenged a tender process. Court noted petitioner was the lowest bidder. Matter disposed of with liberty to respondents to process bids further.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to respondents to process bids further and issue appropriate orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1107916.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11079 OF 2016
M/s G.G.Constructions Company
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.D.Sapkal, advocate holding for Mr.S.S.Bora, advocate for the petitioner
Mr.K.D.Mundhe, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.S.B.Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 23rd December, 2016
PER COURT:
It is informed that during fresh tender process, the financial bids have been analyzed and petitioner is found to be lowest bidder i.e. 9.09% below the estimated cost.
In this view of the matter, it would be open for the Respondents to process the bids further and issue appropriate orders.
With the liberty as aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE
adb/wp1107916
M/s G.G. Constructions Company
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
