The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. Leave to withdraw was granted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6119 OF 2016
(M/s El Dorado Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India
and others)
Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Deshpande, A.S.G.I. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 22nd December, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the
petition. Leave granted. The Writ Petition is disposed
of as withdrawn.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/wp6119-2016
M/s El Dorado Biotech Pvt. Ltd.
The Union of India
others
R.M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court