Disposed
Girish Raut v. Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
Bombay HCPIL/62/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2016 Vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
PILL 75 of 2016
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) No. 75 OF 2016
| Girish Raut | ….Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Vs. | |
| MCGM Mumbai and Anr. | ….Respondents |
None for the Petitioner None for the Respondents
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 8, 2016
P.C. :
2/2 PILL 75 of 2016
this PIL as representation of the Petitioner and decide the same within eight weeks, on merits and in accordance with law. The Petitioner shall submit a copy of the PIL to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 within two weeks. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
M.S. SONAK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Girish Raut
MCGM Mumbai
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court