This is a thin disposal order where Writ Petitions challenged by the State were dismissed. The court directed the Tribunal to decide pending matters within four months upon the State's request for expeditious handling.
Direction to the Tribunal to decide the pending matters within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1012016.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10120 OF 2016
| 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, |
|
|---|---|
| Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others |
Petitioners |
| Versus | |
| Madhukar Ananda Patil & others | Respondents |
| WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10121 OF |
2016 |
| 1 The State of Maharashtra, | |
| through Secretary, | |
| Agriculture Department, | |
| Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others | Petitioners |
| Versus | |
| Sanjay Pundlik Deore | Respondent |
| WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10122 OF |
2016 |
| 1 The State of Maharashtra, | |
| through Secretary, | |
| Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others |
Petitioners |
| Versus | |
| Ramesh Vamanrao Pawar | Respondent |
| WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10123 OF |
2016 |
| 1 The State of Maharashtra, | |
| through Secretary, | |
| Agriculture Department, | |
| Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others | Petitioners |
{2} wp1012016.odt
Versus
Parshuram Sitaram Bramhne & others Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10124 OF 2016 1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners
Versus Arun s/o Pandit Patil Respondent
Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for petitioners.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 07th October, 2016
PER COURT:
1 These petitions are not pressed on behalf of the petitioner-State and the only request, that is made, is to direct the Tribunal to decide pending Original Applications expeditiously. It is also pointed out that at present Division Bench is not available at the Aurangabad Bench of the Tribunal for dealing with the matters.
2 It would be open for the petitioners to make suitable application to the learned Chairman, Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, for constitution of a Division Bench at Aurangabad or for transfer of matters to Mumbai. If such an application is made,
wp1012016.odt
learned Chairman may consider the same and looking to the facts of the case, and prescribe the matters for early hearing.
3 We direct the Tribunal to decide the matters as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from today.
4 With the direction as above, Writ Petitions are disposed
of.
K.K.SONAWANE JUDGE adb/wp1012016
R.M.BORDE JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petitions should be decided when State is not pressing them.
State of Maharashtra
Madhukar Ananda Patil
R.M.BORDE
K.K.SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
