Disposed

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Its Managing Director v. the Union of India and Others

Bombay HC14 Mar 2017WP/5427/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court issued interim directions to Petitioners to file a representation to the Commissioner of Sugar regarding Free Sale Price payments, explicitly reserving merit issues and disposing of writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to put forth grievances to Commissioner of Sugar within four weeks; writ petitions disposed of with liberty.

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Its… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

 WRIT PETITION /5427/2016 with

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15619 OF 2016

¶5

WITH

¶6

WP/5599/2016

¶7

PURNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING

¶8

DIRECTOR
VERSUS

¶9

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

¶10

Advocate for Petitioners: Mr. VD Salunke, Adv.
Mr. Sanjeev B.Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of
India - Resp.No.1;

¶11

Mr. AR Borulkar, AGP for Respondents: 2 to 4.

¶12

CORAM: R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA,JJ.

¶13

DATE : 14th MARCH,2017.

¶14

PER COURT

¶15

1)Heard. It would be open for the petitioners
to approach the Commissioner of Sugar and put-forth
their grievances in respect of payment of FRP to the
agriculturists, who have supplied the sugarcane to
Unit Nos.1 and 2 of Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana.

¶16

2) If the petitioners tender a representation
within four weeks from today, the Commissioner of
Sugar may consider the same and take appropriate
decision within four six weeks from the date of
receipt of such representation.

¶17

3)It is clarified that we have not commented

¶18

¶19

upon merits of the contentions raised by the

¶20

petitioners and it would be open for the Commissioner
of Sugar to consider the grievances of the
petitioners in accordance with the provisions of
law.

¶21

4)With liberty, as aforesaid, the writ
petitions are disposed of. Pending civil

¶22

application, if any, stands disposed of.

¶23

bdv/

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Its Managing Director v. the Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Its Managing Director v. the Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Madhukar Ananda Patil and Others

Baburao Narsing Madaswar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra Rajya Z P Arogya Seva Karmachari Sanghatana Thu Its Authorized Person D M Sonvane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Wejays Enterprises Jalgaon through Its Partner Sanjay Jaykrishna Love Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nitin Nagnathrao Jadhav and Others Vs the Joint Secretary Union of India and Others

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vasmatnagar Dist Hingoli Thr Its Authorized Officer Vs the Union of India and Others