Disposed

Nitin Nagnathrao Jadhav and Others v. the Joint Secretary Union of India and Others

Bombay HC14 Mar 2017WP/1048/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Commissioner of Sugar with grievances regarding FRP payment, provided a representation is tendered within four weeks. The court clarified it did not comment on merits but allowed the Commissioner to decide under law.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach Commissioner of Sugar regarding FRP payment if representation tendered within four weeks; writ petition disposed.

Nitin Nagnathrao Jadhav and Others Vs the Joint Secretary Union of India and Others — Bombay HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

 WRIT PETITION 1048 of 2016

¶4

NITIN NAGNATHRAO JADHAV

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE JOINT SECRETARY, UNION OF INDIA AND AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr.Ashwin Hon, Adv. h/for Mr. VD
Hon
Mr. Sanjeev B.Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of
India - Resp.No.1 and 2;

¶8

Mr. AR Borulkar, AGP for Respondents: 3 & 4.

¶9

Mr. VB Jadhav, Adv. for Resp.No.5.

¶10

CORAM: R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA,JJ.

¶11

DATE : 14th MARCH,2017.

¶12

PER COURT

¶13

1)Heard. It would be open for the petitioner
to approach the Commissioner of Sugar and put-forth
the grievances in respect of payment of FRP to the
agriculturists, who have supplied the sugarcane to
Unit Nos. 1 and 2 of Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana.
2) If the petitioner tenders a representation
within four weeks from today, the Commissioner of
Sugar may consider the same and take appropriate
decision within four six weeks from the date of
receipt of such representation.

¶14

2)It is clarified that we have not commented

¶15

upon merits of the contentions raised by the
petitioner and it would be open for the Commissioner

¶16

¶17

of Sugar to consider the grievances of the petitioner

¶18

in accordance with the provisions of law.

¶19

3)With liberty, as aforesaid, the writ
petition is disposed of. Pending civil application,
if any, stands disposed of.

¶20

 (P.R.BORA) (R.M.BORDE)
 JUDGEJUDGE

¶21

bdv/

Nitin Nagnathrao Jadhav and Others v. the Joint Secretary Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Nagnathrao Jadhav and Others v. the Joint Secretary Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Madhukar Ananda Patil and Others

Baburao Narsing Madaswar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra Rajya Z P Arogya Seva Karmachari Sanghatana Thu Its Authorized Person D M Sonvane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Wejays Enterprises Jalgaon through Its Partner Sanjay Jaykrishna Love Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Its Managing Director Vs the Union of India and Others

Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vasmatnagar Dist Hingoli Thr Its Authorized Officer Vs the Union of India and Others