Disposed

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Sudhir Shivaji Ishi

Bombay HC1 Oct 2016WP/9971/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Judicature of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by the State seeking directions to the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal to decide pending original applications expeditiously due to the unavailability of a Division Bench in Aurangabad.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal to decide pending matters expeditiously, preferably within four months.

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs Sudhir Shivaji Ishi — Bombay HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

wp997116.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9971 OF 2016

¶4

1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Sudhir Shivaji Ishi	Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9972 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Madhukar s/o Ananda Patil & others	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9973 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Jagdishkumar Naval Shirsath & others	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9974 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners

{2}

wp997116.odt

Versus

Dilip Babulal Bhoi & another	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9975 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Sudhakar Omkar Jadhav & others	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9976 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Parshuram Sitaram Brahmhne & others	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9977 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary,
Agriculture Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Ganesh Sitaram Bawiskar	Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9978 OF	2016

¶9

{3}	wp997116.odt
1 The State of Maharashtra,
through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Chandrashekhar s/o Laxman Wani and others	Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9979 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Pravin Naval Deore	Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9980 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus
Arun s/o Pandit Patil	Respondent
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9981 OF	2016
1 The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary,
Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others	Petitioners
Versus

¶10

{4}

¶11

wp997116.odt

¶12

Ramesh Vamanrao Pawar

¶13

Respondent

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO.9982 OF 2016

¶16

1 The State of Maharashtra,

¶17

through Secretary,

¶18

Agriculture Department,

¶19

Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 & others Petitioners

Versus

Sanjay Pundlik Deore

Respondent

Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for petitioners. Mrs.Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, advocate for the Respondents.

¶24

CORAM : R.M.BORDE &

¶25

¶26

DATE : 01st October, 2016

¶27

PER COURT:

¶28

1 These petitions are not pressed on behalf of the petitioner-State and the only request, that is made, is to direct the Tribunal to decide pending Original Applications expeditiously. It is also pointed out that at present Division Bench is not available at the Aurangabad Bench of the Tribunal for dealing with the matters.

¶29

2 It would be open for the petitioners to make suitable application to the learned Chairman, Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, for constitution of a Division Bench at Aurangabad or for transfer of matters to Mumbai. If such an application is made, learned Chairman may consider the same and looking to the facts of the case, prescribe the matters for early hearing.

¶30

wp997116.odt

¶31

{5}

¶32

3 We direct the Tribunal to decide the matters as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from today.

¶33

4 With the direction as above, Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶34

P.R.BORA JUDGE

¶35

R.M.BORDE JUDGE

¶36

adb/wp997116

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Sudhir Shivaji Ishi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra and Others v. Sudhir Shivaji Ishi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Ajimoddin Pachulal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shridhar Vasudeo Choure Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kumari Amarpreet Kaur D/O Harpalsingh Ramgariah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maharashtra Rajya Z P Arogya Seva Karmachari Sanghatana Thu Its Authorized Person D M Sonvane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sudhakar Sitaram Kankal and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vikrant Shivaji Bilpe and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others