Clarification order confirming that a previously disposed Public Interest Litigation is also disposed of. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Liberty is granted to the parties to apply if necessary regarding the clarification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( PIL 99 of 2015)
vat
Vaishali Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.99 OF 2015
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 593 OF 2015
Mr.Mehmood Iqrar Shaikh ...Petitioner/Applicant Vs. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors. ...Respondents
...Petitioner/Applicant
Ms.Asmita Sarangdhar for Petitioner
Mr.Chetan Mali i/b. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.J.S. Saluja for Respondent Nos.4 & 5 Mr.Ajay Patil for Respondent No.6 ***********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 13, 2016
P.C. :
1. An application is made for speaking to the minutes of the order
dated 21.12.2015. It is submitted that the PIL was also disposed of. However, the same was not mentioned in the said order.
Sd/Sd/[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
1/1
Vaishali Tikam
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
V. M. KANADE
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
