Disposed
Cricket Association of Bihar v. the Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another
Bombay HCPIL/30/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
30 of 2014) vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(PIL 30 of 2014)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 30 OF 2014
Cricket Association of Bihar ...Petitioner Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Ameet Naik a/w. Mr. Asadulla Thangal i/b. Naik Naik & CO. for Petitioner
Mr.Aditya Mehta a/w. Mr.Adarsh Saxena a/w. Mr.Anush Mathkar i/b. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas for Respondent No.1 Mr.Prashant Beri i/b. Beri & Co. for Respondent No.2
CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 08, 2016
P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Cricket Association of Bihar
Board of Control for Cricket in India
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court