The High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability, observing that the petitioner had an alternate remedy of approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
929-wp.1263.2014
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1263 OF 2014
Sandeep Chandrakant Kalekar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Vikas Mali, AGP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
have filed an affidavit in reply.
on behalf of the respondent regarding maintainability of this petition It is submitted that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of filing an application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Secondly, it is submitted
929-wp.1263.2014
2/2
that the information given by the petitioner in his application was incorrect.
Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Sandeep Chandrakant Kalekar
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
