The petitioner did not appear; Noriu appeared for the respondent. The PIL was dismissed due to want of prosecution.
PIL dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(PIL 14 of 2013)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 14 OF 2013
Friends of Wadala East ...Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and Ors. ...Respondents
None for Petitioner
Mr. Y.S. Bhate a/w. Mr.A.R. Verma for Respondent No.1- Union of India
Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondent -BMC ***********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 08, 2016 P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Friends of Wadala East
The Union of India
V. M. KANADE
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
