The petitioner filed a PIL regarding notices. Counsel for the State assured compliance. The court disposed of the petition based on that assurance without further orders.
The petition was disposed of on the assurance given by the State counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
2-PILL-5495-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST.) NO. 5495 OF 2015
Mr. Shriprakash Neel .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sagar A. Joshi for Petitioner. Mr. C. P. Yadav – AGP for State.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 05 JULY 2016
P.C.:
Upon assurance being given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State that the notices which are issued will be acted upon in accordance with the law, nothing survives in this petition. Petition is disposed of.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Mr. Shriprakash Neel
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
