Public Interest Litigation disposed without adjudication on merits as the matter regarding claimed reliefs was already pending before the Revenue Minister. Petitioner granted liberty to file fresh petition.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh petition if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-pil-136.2014.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 136 OF 2014
Shri Balaram K. Shid & Ors.
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr.J.M. Puranik for the petitioner.
Mr. Asif Patel, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 5.
Mr. Dushwant Pagare i/by Mr. R.S. Datar for respondent nos. 6 to 8.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : JULY 04, 2016.
P.C.
Undisputedly in relation to the reliefs claimed in this petition, matter is pending before the Revenue Minister. In the circumstances, with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition if need so arises, this writ petition (PIL) is disposed of.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Shri Balaram K. Shid & Ors.
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
