Disposed

Shri. Prakash Shrawanji Itankar and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Medical Education and Medicine and Others

Bombay HC7 Jul 2016PIL/54/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Public Interest Litigation sought directions for permission to operate a Medical College for the academic session 2015-2016. The court disposed of the petition, finding the matter settled given Medical Council of India's approval, while reserving liberty to approach again if impediments to infrastructure or operation arise.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shri. Prakash Shrawanji Itankar and Another Vs State… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

PIL54-15.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

Public Interest Litigation No. 54/2015 (Prakash Shrawanji Itankar and another .vs. State of Maharashtra and others. )

¶5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr. A.S.Kilor, Advocate for Petitioners.

¶7

Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 4. Mr. R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mrs. Mugdha Chandurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.5.

¶8

CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : July 07,2016.

¶9

The petition was filed specifically for a direction to the respondents to reconsider the issue of grant of permission to Chandrapur Government Medical College and Hospital from the year 2015-2016.

¶10

By way of our interim order dated 8.7.2015, we had directed respondent no.5- Union of India to approve the scheme submitted by respondent no.1State of Maharashtra for establishing Government Medical College with an annual intake of 100 MBBS students at Chandrapur. The said order was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by way of S.L.P.No.19504/2015. However, the said SLP was disposed of by their Lordships vide order dated 24.07.2015.

¶11

A question for continuation of approval for the academic session 2015-2016 also fell for consideration before us. However, on this occasion, the Medical Council of India was gracious enough to give a positive

¶12

¶13

PIL54-15.odt

¶14

recommendation for continuation of the approval for academic session 2016-2017 also.

¶15

In that view of the matter, we find that the petition has served its purpose. The same is disposed of. However, we reserve the liberty of the petitioners to approach again if the petitioners find that there are impediments in continuing the Medical College or there are lapses on the part of the State Government in providing the necessary infrastructure facilities.

¶16

JUDGE

¶17

JUDGE

¶18

halwai

Shri. Prakash Shrawanji Itankar and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Medical Education and Medicine and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shri. Prakash Shrawanji Itankar and Another v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Medical Education and Medicine and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar-Pande Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 7 Ors.

Bombay Lawyers Association Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

Mr. Shriprakash Neel Vs the State of Maharashtra through Dept. of Land Revenue and Ors.

Mr. Santosh Digambar Honkarape and Anr. Vs the Central Adoption Resource Agency and Ors.

Shri Anwar Chandan Jamadar vs Kolhapur District Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd. through Its Chairman and Anr.

Aam Aadmi Lok Manch through Its President Shri. P. P. Goyal Vs State of Maharashtra through the Provincial Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Pune

Mr. Hemant Baburao Patil Vs Union of India through Solicitor General of India and Ors.

Kunal S/O Nitin Raut Vs the State of Maharashtra Dept. of Technical Education Thr. Secretary Mumbai and Others

Ganesh S/O Bhojram Parate Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Nandanwan, Nagpur and Others

Ganpat Barkuji Parteki (in Jail) Vs the State of Mahrashtra through Deputy Inspector General of Police (Prison), East Division Nagpur

Anandrao Kisan Gedam Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Ashokappa S/O. Narayanappa Iregaonkar Vs the State of Maha., Dept. of Rural Water Supply, through Its Principal Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Mr. Gajanan S/O. Sanjay Charde Vs State of Maha., through Its Secretary, Dept. of Public Work, and Others

Naresh S/O Laxminarayan Bhutada Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Akot Gramin, Akola and Another