Shri. Prathamesh Vilas Karangutkar Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Intergrated Headquarter (Navy), Ministry of Defence and Ors.

P. C. 1] The petitioner challenges the order dated 28 October 2013 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), dismissing the petitioner's Original Application No. 606 of 2013.

¶12

2] We have heard Mr. Puranik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vinod Joshi alongwith Mr. P.S. Gujar for respondent Nos.1 to 4. We have also perused the record as well as the impugned order made by the CAT.

¶13

3] We are satisfied that the petitioner has not made out any case warranting interference with the impugned order. The CAT has

¶14

1 / 2

¶15

wp-2328-14

¶16

rightly noted that the petitioner had secured only 12 marks in the written test, when in fact, the last candidate upon the select list had secured 51 marks. Similarly, even in the oral interview, the petitioner secured lesser marks than last candidate on the select list. In matters of determination of relative merit, neither the CAT nor for that this Court, can have any substantial role to play, particularly in the absence of any charge of mala-fides.

¶17

4] In the aforesaid circumstances, there is no case made out to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶18

5] There shall however, be no order as to costs.

¶19

[M. S. SONAK, J.]

¶20

2 / 2

Shri. Prathamesh Vilas Karangutkar v. Union of India, through Secretary, Intergrated Headquarter (Navy), Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Prathamesh Vilas Karangutkar v. Union of India, through Secretary, Intergrated Headquarter (Navy), Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Ramchandran and Another Vs Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India and 3 Others

Indian Education Society and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

The State of Maharashtra through the Commissioner and Ors. Vs Shri Madhukar S/O. Bhaurao Chondhe

Shri Sanjay M. Sarode Vs Department of Industries, Energy and Labour, through Its Secretary and Ors.

Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority Vs Vanashakti Public Trust and Ors.

Shri. Vaijinath Dnyanoba Partapure and Ors. Vs the District Collector, Ratnagiri and Ors.