Allowed Criminal Applications (APPP) No.252 and No.251 of 2016 on the present dates, condoning delay in one and restoring an application to the file.
Allowed the applications; condoned delay and restored Crl. App. No.623 of 2012 to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
213appp252.16
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application (APPP) No.252 of 2016 in Criminal Application (APPP) No.251 of 2016 in Criminal Application (APL) No.623 of 2012
(Vijay Anandrao Moghe and anr. vs. State and anr.)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr.R.S.Kurekar, Adv. for the applicants. Mrs.S.S.Jachak, A.P.P. for respondent no.1/State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 21.3.2016.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in Criminal Application No.252 of 2016, same is allowed. Delay is condoned.
Criminal Application No.251 of 2016
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Criminal Application (APL) No.623 of 2012 is restored to file.
JUDGE
JUDGE
**_jaiswal_*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application should be condoned and the application allowed.
Vijay Anandrao Moghe
State
B.R.GAVAI
A.S.CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
