The High Court condoned the delay in filing the notice of motion by the petitioner after finding the explanation satisfactory. The notice of motion was allowed.
Delay in filing the notice of motion is condoned; Notice of Motion is allowed; Writ Petition is restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P-907-nmwl-440-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.440 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1596 OF 2015
M/s. Power House Fitness Limited ...Petitioner
vs.
The Commissioner, MCGM and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Ashish Kamat a/w. Mr. Kunal Mehta, Mr. Suraj Iyer i/b. M/s. Ganesh & Co., for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita Aanchan i/b. M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., for Respondent No. 3. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar, for the Respondent-BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 17, 2016
P.C.:
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
was dismissed by the Registry on account of non-compliance of office objections. Heard on the question of delay for filing the Notice of Motion. We find that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly the delay is condoned. On due consideration, the Notice of Motion is allowed.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
P-907-nmwl-440-2016
restored to its original No. Writ Petition (L) No.1596 of 2015.
Notice of Motion is disposed of.
2/2
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was sufficient cause to condone the delay in filing the notice of motion.
M/s. Power House Fitness Limited
The Commissioner, MCGM and Others
SHANTANU KEMKAR
MAKARAND KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
