A PIL petition seeking demolition of unauthorized structures in Aramnagar was disposed of as the petitioner Forum has worked out after the Corporation and State Government took necessary steps, with earlier orders continuing.
Petition disposed; earlier orders to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
31pil88-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 88 OF 2015
DISHA … Petitioner.
Through its Authorized Singatory : Mr. Mehmood Shaikh
V/s.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others. … Respondents.
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Anil Y. Sakhare, Senior counsel a/w. Ms. Tripti Puranik, Advocate for the -BMC.
Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar, Addl. G.P. For the State. Mr. V.M. Parshurami, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,JJ.
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2016
P.C. :
1 None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation and the learned Addl. G.P. for the State.
2 The Petitioner is seeking appropriate writ order and direction, directing the Corporation to demolish
1/2
Borey
31pil88-15.odt
spb/
unauthorized structures on the disputed plot at the area of Aramnagar Part I and II, situated at Varsova, Andheri-West, Mumbai. The Corporation has filed affidavit and stated that unauthorized structures at the said site have been demolished to a large extent. It is stated that in some cases in view of the stay order granted by the Civil Courts, the suit structures could not be demolished. It is further stated that in respect of other structures, without police protection it is not possible to demolish those suit structures.
3 We are satisfied that the Corporation and the State Government have taken all steps for demolishing the unauthorized structures. The PIL has, therefore, worked itself out.
4 The Petition is disposed of.
The orders passed earlier shall continue.
(MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,J.) (V. M. KANADE,J.)
2/2
Borey
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Disha
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
