Public Interest Litigation dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear or pursue the matter despite multiple dates. No merits were addressed.
PIL dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PIL 58 of 2014
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 58 OF 2014
Rajaram Posiah Santh ...Petitioner Vs. Commissioner, Bruhan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Ms. Trupti Puranik for BMC for Respondent Nos.1 and 2
Mr. Shweta Merchant i/b. Solicis Lex for Respondent No.3
Mr. Amit Shastri -AGP for Respondent No.4
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : AUGUST 23, 2016
P.C. :
PIL. PIL, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Rajaram Posiah Santh
Commissioner, Bruhan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika
Others
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
