PIL dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the last hearing date and was not keen in pursuing the petition.
PIL dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PIL 90 of 2014
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 90 OF 2014
Megha Raju Acharya ….Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. C.P. Yadav -AGP for the State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : AUGUST 23, 2016
P.C. :
i.e. on 18th August, 2016, neither the Petitioner nor his counsel was present.
Hence, PIL is dismissed for want of prosecution.
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Megha Raju Acharya
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
Smt. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
