Dismissed
Purushottam Chandrakant Pujari v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/10/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
24pil10-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 10 OF 2015
Purushottam Chandrakant Pujari … Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. ---
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,JJ.
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2016 P.C. :
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Even on last two dates, the Petitioner or his counsel was not present when the matter was called out. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing this litigation.
The Petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,J.) (V. M. KANADE,J.)
1/1
Borey
Purushottam Chandrakant Pujari
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court