Dismissed
Amit Maru v. the State of Maharashtra and 10 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/82/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-pil.82.2013.doc
1/1
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.82 OF 2013
Amit Maru ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms.Geeta Shastri, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Counsel a/w Ms.Trupti Puranik, for the Respondent – BMC.
Mr.Sanjay Kadam a/w Ms.Apeksha Sharma i/b Kadam & Co., for the Respondent No.10.
Mr.Kuldip Pawar i/b Mr.Niranjan A. Mogre, for the Respondent No.11.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
petition, though reply and rejoinder have already been filed.
prosecution.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Amit Maru
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court