Dismissed
Amit Maru v. the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Bombay HCPIL/100/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-pil.100.2012.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.100 OF 2012
Amit Maru ...Petitioner
Versus The Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms.S.V.Bharucha, for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.J.S.Saluja, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
Mr.Gaurav Joshi, Senior Counsel a/w Mr.Sahil Gandhi i/b Markand Gandhi & Co., for the Respondent No.6 and 7.
Mr.Rushil Mathur i/b Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the Respondent No.8.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
record. The grievance of the petitioner inter alia is that the clearance
13-pil.100.2012.doc
2/2
of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (“MOEF”) has not been
obtained for the purpose of construction of an Airport.
It appears that the petitioner is not keen in pursuing the petition.
prosecution.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Amit Maru
The Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests
V. M. KANADE
REvATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court