Petitioner filed PIL claiming efflux of time rendered it infructuous; petitioner was absent; petition dismissed for being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-pil.67.2013.doc
1/1
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.67 OF 2013
Sahayak …. A Socio-Legal & Educational Forum ...Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
infructuous.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Sahayak ... A Socio-Legal & Educational Forum
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
