Petition seeking closure of non-functioning units disposed of as purpose served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
PIL125-13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.125/2013
(Eco-PRO Bahu-Uddeshiya Sanstha .vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. N.S. Khandewale, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. Mugdha Chandurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4,5 & 7. Mr. S.S. Sanyal, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : January 21, 2016.
The petition has been filed for a direction to close down Unit Nos. 1 and 2 at Chandrapur. It is not in dispute that both the Units have now been stopped and as such are not functioning.
In that view of the matter, the petition has served its purpose. Public interest litigation is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Eco-PRO Bahu-Uddeshiya Sanstha
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
