The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL regarding SRA Land, stating the petitioner could approach the appropriate forum for the dispute. The petition was disposed of without entertaining it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PILL 55 of 2016
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST INTERST (L) No. 55 OF 2016
Anant N. Joshi ….Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Pradeep Havnur for the Petitioner
Ms. Trupti Puranik for the Respondent -BMC
Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w. Viloma Shah a/w. Swapnil Gupte i/b. M/s. Hariani & Co. for Respondent No.5
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 3, 2016
P.C. :
dispute regarding SRA Land. Aggrieved party can very well file an appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum.
the Petitioner to take an appropriate steps, the PIL is disposed of.
M.S. SONAK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain this Public Interest Litigation regarding SRA Land.
Anant N. Joshi
State of Maharashtra
BMC
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
