In a contempt petition, the High Court directed respondents to decide expeditiously on illegal construction within four weeks and disposed of the petition.
Direct respondents to take a decision on illegal construction within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(VAT)
(CONPW 17 OF 2016)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Cont. Petition NO. 17 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1340 OF 2015
Vinod Mohanlal Jain ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. Raju Mane -AGP for the State
CORAM: V.M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ
DATED: 1st August, 2016
PC:-
said order, what we have observed are as under:
“The grievance of the Petitioner is that the Respondents be directed to
take action against illegal construction carried out by the holders of the
premises. We direct the Respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 6 to take appropriate
decision in accordance with law after hearing the parties as expeditiously
as possible.”
(M.S. SONAK,J.)
(V.M. KANADE,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are to take an expeditious decision on illegal construction within four weeks.
Whether the contempt petition regarding delayed decision-making should be disposed of.
Vinod Mohanlal Jain
The State of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
