This writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner and counsel were absent on the last date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 1855-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1855 OF 2016
M/s. Abhishek Enterprises through its Prop. Tukaram P. Jagtap … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. B. Thadani, AGP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JULY 25, 2016
PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Even on the last date 18.6.2016 neither petitioner nor his counsel was present when the matter was called out. Ad-interim was not granted on 11th February, 2016. It appears that the Petitioner is not keen in pursuing the petition. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
M/s. Abhishek Enterprises through its Prop. Tukaram P. Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
