In this PIL, the Bombay High Court directed Respondent No. 3 to decide a petition regarding the shifting of a liquor shop within six weeks. The petition was disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 122-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 122 OF 2016
Minakshi Manohar Mali & Ors. … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. D. V. Sutar, for the Petitioners.
Mr. V. B. Thadani, AGP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JULY 25, 2016
PC.
. This PIL can be conveniently disposed of by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide the representation of the Petitioners, dated 29.3.2016 for shifting of the liquor shop to another locality, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within a period of six weeks. PIL is accordingly disposed.
Sd/Sd/[M. S. SONAK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Minakshi Manohar Mali
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
