Petitioner abandoned the criminal writ petition due to subsequent developments; Court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp123.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.123/2016
Ganesh s/o Bhojram Parate ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Nandanwan Nagpur and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JULY 5, 2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development, the petitioner does not want to press the present petition.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
kahale
Ganesh s/o Bhojram Parate
The State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Nandanwan Nagpur and others
B.R.Gavai
V.M.Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
