The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, disposed of Public Interest Litigation No.40 of 2016 by granting the petitioner liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to file the petition afresh.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
103pil40.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
P.I.L. No.40 of 2016
(Anil Shamsundar Agre .vs. Union of India, through its Secretary, Food and Supply Deptt. New Delhi and Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr.S.D.Chande, Adv. for petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Jachak, AGP for respondent nos. 2 to 6.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10.3.2016.
Mr.S.D.Chande, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to file the petition afresh. Hence, the petition is disposed of as 'withdrawn', with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*jaiswal
Anil Shamsundar Agre
Union of India
B. R. GAVAI
A.S.CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
