The petitioner was directed to file a representation/application to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 for declaration of results. The respondents were directed to respond within two weeks of filing the said application. The writ petition was disposed of in the above terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3083 OF 2016
SUSHILKUMAR LALASAHEB PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Naiknavare Ramesh V.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.V. Virdhe
...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: April 16, 2016
...
PER COURT :-
Heard. The learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner, on instructions, submits that, the
petitioner will file the application/representation
with Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 requesting therein for
declaration of results within two weeks from today.
In case, such application/representation is filed,
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to respond such
representation/application, as expeditiously as
possible within two weeks from filing such
application.
2.The Petition is disposed of in the above
terms.
3.The parties to act upon an authenticated
copy of this order.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)
sga/-
Sushilkumar Lalasaheb Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court