Public Interest Litigation dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not keen in pursuing the matter and was unrepresented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 40-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 40 OF 2014
Radheyshyam Brahamdev Mishra … Petitioner Vs. The Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents *** None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 25, 2016 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that Petitioner is not keen in pursuing the matter. PIL is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Radheyshyam Brahamdev Mishra
The Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. KANADE
SWAPNA S. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
