A Public Interest Litigation was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners were not keen in pursuing the matter and none appeared on their behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 12-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 12 OF 2014
Mr. Virendra Ramsamujh Mishra & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Manish Nagar Societies' Association & Ors.... Respondents ***
None for the Petitioners. None for Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 25, 2015
PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioners. It appears that the Petitioners are not keen in pursuing the matter. PIL is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Mr. Virendra Ramsamujh Mishra & Ors.
Manish Nagar Societies' Association & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
