Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant appeared without counsel and was not keen in pursuing the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
221app569-06.odt
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 569 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2544 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1942 OF 1999
Bombay Processors … Appellant.
V/s.
Nilima Rajiv Bhansali (nee Nilima Hasmukhbhai Javeri ) … Respondent. ---
None for the Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,JJ.
DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2016 P.C. :
None appears on behalf of the appellant. Appellant is not keen in pursuing this appeal.
Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI,J.) (V. M. KANADE,J.)
1/1
Borey
Bombay Processors
Nilima Rajiv Bhansali (nee Nilima Hasmukhbhai Javeri)
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
