The High Court of Bombay disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 96 of 2015 by directing the appropriate Corporation Officer to treat the petition as a representation and decide it on merits.
Director appropriate Corporation Officer to treat the petition as a representation and decide on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PIL/96/2015
BDPPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.96 OF 2015
Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi
….. Petitioner.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra through Ministry of Urban Development Department and Others ….. Respondents.
Mr. Rakesh Agrawal for the Petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for the State. Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondent No.2/MMC. Ms. Jahnavi Dwarkadas with Mr. Shyam Gopal for Respondent No.4.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE: 26th August, 2016
P.C.:-
2. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
(MRS SWAPNA JOSHI, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi
The State of Maharashtra through Ministry of Urban Development Department
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
