Dismissed

Kiran Milind Magar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC12 Apr 2016WP/1439/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, though noting the petition could normally not be entertained, directed the Standing Committee of the Jalgaon Municipal Corporation to decide the pending appeal on its merits within six months. The judgment dismissed the writ petition after issuing these directions.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Standing Committee to decide the pending appeal on merits and communicate the decision within six months.

Kiran Milind Magar Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

(1)W.P. No. 1439 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

¶3

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

¶4

Writ Petition No. 1439 of 2016

¶5

District : Jalgaon

¶6

Kiran s/o. Milind Magar,
Age : 36 years,
Occupation : Service,
at present dismissed,
R/o. Behind Akbar Talkies,
Bhusawal, Taluka : Bhusawal,
District : Jalgaon. .. Petitioner.

¶7

versus

¶8

1.The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Department of Urban Development,
M.S., Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶9

2.The Chairman,
Standing Committee,
Municipal Corporation,
Jalgaon,
Taluka & District : Jalgaon.

¶10

3.The Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation,
Jalgaon,
Taluka & District : Jalgaon. .. Respondents.

¶11

............ Mr. Govind Kulkarni, Advocate, holding for Mr. Rajendra S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent no.1.

¶12

............

¶13

(2)W.P. No. 1439 of 2016

¶14

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

¶15

DATE : 12TH APRIL 2016

¶16

PER COURT :

¶17

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner and the learned Asst. Government Pleader
appearing for respondent no.1 - State.

¶18

2.Normally we would not have entertained the
petition. However, it is submitted by the learned
Counsel for the petitioner that the appeal filed by
the petitioner is pending before the Standing
Committee of Jalgaon Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon,
since 17th March 2006.

¶19

3.We direct respondent no.2 to decide the said
appeal, in case, not already decided, on its own
merits, as expeditiously as possible, however, within
six months from today and communicate the decision so
taken to the petitioner. Needless to observe that
the petitioner shall extend full cooperation for
early disposal of the said appeal.

¶20

4.With the above directions, the petition is
disposed of.

¶21

(3)W.P. No. 1439 of 2016

¶22

5.Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of
this order.

¶23

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (S.S. SHINDE)

¶24

 JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

 puranik / WP1439.16

Kiran Milind Magar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Milind Magar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marathwada Sarvoday Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Madhav Laluji Pallewad and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vitthal Punaji Rathod and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Harsha Jitendra Patil Vs Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji High School Sanstha and Others

Vyankat Ramdas Jadhav and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Maharashtra Rajya Prathmik Shikshak Samiti Thr Its Secretary Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another