Single judge order disposing a PIL as a representation. The court directed respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to act on the petition and decided the matter without recording findings.
Respondents directed to consider PIL as representation and take a decision in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 35-13
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 35 OF 2013
Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat ... Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Commissioner & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. H. C. Pimple, for the Respondent – BMC. Mr. Bharat Mehta, AGP for Respondent - State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016
PC.
. PIL can be conveniently disposed of by directing Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider this PIL as a representation of the Petitioner and take a decision in accordance with law. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat
The Municipal Commissioner
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
