Disposed

Manoj S/O. Namdeorao Walke v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation

Bombay HC25 Feb 2016PIL/44/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a social worker, sought directions to create Extension Officer posts at Panchayat Samiti level to implement Social Welfare schemes. The respondents admitted a six-month requirement for creation. The petition was disposed of by accepting the respondents' statement.

What did the court decide?

Accepted the State Government's undertaking to create the posts within six months.

Manoj S/O. Namdeorao Walke Vs State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1/2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.44 OF 2015

¶4

(Manoj s/o Namdeorao Walke vs. State of Maharashtra and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶5

Shri A.R. Ingole, Advocate for petitioner. Smt. K. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents.

¶6

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

¶7

DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2016

¶8

The petitioner, who is a social worker, has filed the present petition for issuance of direction to respondents to create the posts of Extension Officer (Social Welfare) for effective implementation of various Schemes floated under the Social Welfare Department at Panchayat Samiti level.

¶9

It is the contention of the petitioner that though there are various schemes framed by the State Government in the Department of Social Welfare, on account of non-availability of posts of Extension Officer (Social Welfare) at the Panchayat Samiti level, the said schemes cannot be implemented effectively.

¶10

In the affidavit dated 14/10/2015 filed on behalf of respondents, it is stated that in the meeting held

¶11

2/2

¶12

on 1/4/2015 under the Chairmanship of Hon'ble Chief Minister, it was proposed to create additional posts for implementation of schemes framed under Social Justice Department.

¶13

Vide our order dated 7/1/2016 we had asked the learned Assistant Government Pleader to take instructions as to within how much time the posts would be created.

¶14

Accordingly, affidavit dated 24/2/2016 is filed on behalf of State Government wherein it is stated that a period of about six months would be required for creation of the said posts.

¶15

The petition is, therefore, disposed of by accepting the statement made on behalf of State Government that posts as prayed for in the petition would be created within six months from today.

¶16

JUDGE JUDGE

¶17

khj

Manoj S/O. Namdeorao Walke v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj S/O. Namdeorao Walke v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Dadasaheb More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anothers

Resources of Aviation Redressal Association (Roar) and 5 Ors. Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

Shri. Manoj Suresh Pingle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ashok Anjappa Koli Vs Wimco Limited and Ors.

Arpit Jagdish Minase, and Another Vs the State of Maharshtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. Mumbai and 3 Others

Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat Vs Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Dinesh Mody Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Prakash J. Salsingikar Vs State of Maharashtra

Siddharth Kawduji Onkar and Others Vs the Education Officer (Sec.), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Others

Dr. Sanajy S/O. Shrikisanrao Lokhande Vs Central Council of Indian Medicine Thr Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Mohammad Zahid S/O Mohd. Abid Vs Sanjaysinh Gautam and Others

Wasudeo S/O Yadavrao Khobragade Vs C.D. Dahadkar Additional Collector and Incharge C.E.O.,Z.P.

Sushant Gajananrao Barahate Vs Govt. of Maharashtra Thorugh Its Chie Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Suo Moto Vs the Principal Secretary (Home) Department, Mantralaya Mumbai and Others