This order condones the delay in filing an application for restoration of a Family Court Appeal previously dismissed for want of prosecution and allows the application.
Civil application allowed; matter restored to the file for the reasons stated in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAM. 371-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 371 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No. 308 OF 2014
Samir Jayant Shastri … Applicant Vs.
Sheetal @ Vandana Samir Shastri … Respondent
Mr. Omkar Narvekar i/b Pramod Arjunwadkar, for the Applicant. Mr. Kuldeep Tanaji Pawar a/w Ravi Girish Shinde a/w Gurudas Sanjeev Gorwadkar i/b S. M. Gorwadkar, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016 PC.
2 This civil application is filed for restoration of the Family Court Appeal No. 308/2014, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 17th July, 2015. The delay caused in filing this application is condoned and the appeal is restored to the file, for the reasons stated in the civil application. Civil application is accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (b).
Sd/Sd/[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application for restoration of the dismissed appeal should be condoned.
Samir Jayant Shastri
Sheetal @ Vandana Samir Shastri
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
