In this PIL under Article 226, the petitioner sought various reliefs including calls for records of pending money laundering cases and implementation of a Supreme Court order. The Court held that the claimed reliefs cannot be granted under Article 226 jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRPILL. 63-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (St) No. 63 OF 2015
Snehil Dhall s/o Sanjesh Dhali ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Syed Ejaz Abbas Naqvi, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APPfor Respondent - State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016
PC.
“A. Public Interest Litigation may kindly be allowed.
1 / 2
CRPILL. 63-15
MCOCA to be provided for further research under Transitional Organized Crime.
this Court while exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Criminal PIL is therefore dismissed.
Sd/Sd/[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether relief sought in Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 regarding pending money laundering cases can be granted.
Whether this Court can grant the reliefs claimed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Snehil Dhall
State of Maharashtra
V. M. KANADE
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
