The Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) noting that prior enquiry had been conducted and the affected party had challenged the Collector's order. Consequently, pending civil applications related to the matter were also disposed of.
PIL stands disposed of; pending civil applications also stand disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vina k. main.sr.45.pil.177.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.177 OF 2013
Shri Sunil Shivram Patil & ors. … Petitioners V/s. Smt. Sharda Ramesh Patil and ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Ramesh Sawant i/b. Mr. S. V. Pitre for the petitioner. Mr. S. B. Kalel, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 20 th DECEMBER, 2016.
P.C. :
. In view of the earlier order passed by this Court noticing that the enquiry has already been conducted and that the affected party has challenged the order passed by the Collector in pursuance to the said enquiry.
2 . In our considered view, nothing survive in this Public Interest Litigation. As a result, the PIL stands disposed of.
3 . In view of of the disposal of the PIL pending civil applications also stand disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the pending Public Interest Litigation survives given that an enquiry had already been conducted and the affected party had challenged the Collector's order.
Whether the pending civil applications require separate disposal upon the dismissal of the primary PIL.
Shri Sunil Shivram Patil & ors.
Smt. Sharda Ramesh Patil and ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
