cai-66-15.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
Learned counsel for the petitioner was granted leave to amend the petition; respondents directed to file reply within six weeks; matter listed per CMIS date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cai-66-15.doc
rpa 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2015 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.195 OF 2013
Sharad Baburao Patil .. Applicant/ Petitioner IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Sharad Baburao Patil .. Petitioner V/s. The Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Rajendra Pai a/w. Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent – State. Mr.D.P. Singh a/w. Mr. G.R. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. C.M. Lokesh, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Ms. Sharmila V. Deshmukh a/w. Ms. Rupali Dixit, Advocate for Respondent No.12.
Mr.Ajay Magdum i/b. Mr.S.S. Patwardhan, Advocate for Respondent No.16.
Ms.Jyoti Sinha i/b. Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah, Advocate for Respondent No.17.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2016.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
leave to amend the petition. The amendment as proposed in the
rpa 2/2 cai-66-15.doc
schedule filed with the application is permitted to be carried out within two weeks from today.
2 Additional reply to the amended petition be filed by the respondents within six weeks from today.
3 List the petition as per C.M.I.S. date.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Sharad Baburao Patil
The Union of India & Ors.
Prakash D. Naik
Shantanu S. Kemkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
