The High Court at Nagpur rejected a public interest litigation attempting to reopen an issue previously concluded in PIL No.67/2013 and subsequently reviewed and disposed of in Misc. Civil Application No.723/2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil176.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Public Interest Litigation No.176/2016
Narayan Bajirao Parwatkar ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, General Administration, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2016
The present petition seeks to reopen an issue which was not only concluded by the judgment and order dated 11.12.2014 passed in Public Interest Litigation No.67/2013 but also which was reviewed by this Court in Misc. Civil Application No.723/2014 and disposed of on 16.01.2015.
In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition. The same is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
Narayan Bajirao Parwatkar
State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
